Greka restricted from Bell
Lease cleanup
For the second time this year, the Environmental
Protection Agency has kicked Greka Oil and Gas
Company off a cleanup project, charging non-compliance as its reasoning.
As of March 31, Greka is no
longer allowed to participate in the oil cleanup taking place at its Bell Lease
property, located at 6801 Palmer Road in Santa Maria.
“The EPA is stepping in to prevent further harm to the
environment,” Daniel Meer, response chief for EPA, said in a press release.
“We have given Greka Oil and Gas
every opportunity to properly conduct this cleanup under federal oversight, but
they have failed.”
Despite the prohibition, the County of Santa Barbara
lifted a stop work order that shut down Greka
operations at the Bell Lease located at 6801 Palmer Road in Santa Maria. The
stop-work order was rescinded on April 8.
The county determined that Greka
corrected all of the Fire Department’s requirements to become operational.
These measures included Greka’s implementation of
around-the-clock staffing at its facilities, a plan to improve physical
containment and the implementation of adequate transfer pipes.
Greka
has 30 days from the date that the stop-work order was lifted to submit a new
Bell System Fire Upgrade Plan, complete a soil categorization, complete a tank
inspection, place a net over the pond at the property and remove all fluids
from the same pond. If Greka does not comply, the
county could issue another stop-work order.
The Bell Lease spill happened on Dec. 7. According to the
EPA, the incident spilled 75,000 gallons of crude oil.
The protection agency is accusing Greka
of refusing to remove petroleum and contaminated debris in a timely manner from
the site.
“No work had been done at the site for two weeks,” said
Mary Simms, EPA media relations representative.
“And with the forecasts of rain, we were concerned about a
re-release of oil into the environment.”
Greka
maintains that it began the cleanup process but couldn’t proceed as intended
because the EPA did not approve its health and safety plan, which was required
before actual work could be done on the affected area.
Greka
hired FRS, a third-party contractor, to clean up the oil spill; FRS submitted
the health and safety plan to the EPA.
“The EPA replied to [the] health and safety plan with a
volume of questions and requirements unlike anything they had seen before,”
said Greka media spokesman Robert Emmers
in a press release April 1.
Greka
claims that the EPA didn’t give them any notice before taking over the site and
that the environmental agency’s actions have gotten in the way of their cleanup
efforts.
“The bottom line: EPA’s hasty actions have prevented Greka from quickly and efficiently completing the cleanup,”
Emmers said in the press release.
The EPA also charged Greka with
failing to comply with an earlier order that was issued to require Greka to submit work plans for the Bell Lease cleanup by
Feb. 14 and Feb. 28.
Greka
in turn has accused the EPA of making false accusations regarding the work
orders, and claims that the work plans were delivered to the EPA.
It is also claiming that the EPA is not coöperating with Greka’s request
for additional time to turn in a work order that was due by April 1.
The EPA is standing by its comments.
“Accuracy is a commitment we take very seriously,” Simms
said.
“We stand by the information we released.”
In addition to the corrective actions, the EPA is
conducting an ongoing investigation of Greka, the
results of which it will turn over to the California Department of Justice.
When the entire cleanup is done and the costs are
determined, the EPA will make a recommendation to the department of justice,
which will then decide how to deal with Greka, Simms
said.
At that time, the total amount of fines will be
determined and added to EPA’s cost for the cleanup, estimated to be about
$900,000.