Candidate Forum at St. Mark’s
Four
of the five candidates for the open 3rd District supervisor’s seat met at St.
Mark’s-in-the-Valley Church in Los Olivos, April 22
for a discussion of the issues confronting the district and the county.
Candidates
Dr. David Bearman, Doreen Farr, Victoria Pointer, and
Steve Pappas met at the church for the forum sponsored by several local
activist and community interest groups. Candidate David Smyser
sent a letter indicating his regret that he had to miss the meeting, saying
“the date did not fit into my calendar of events” and that he had “already
participated in other forums.”
Sponsored
by community groups Buellton is Our Town, Santa Ynez Valley Alliance, Women’s
Environmental Watch, Preservation of Los Olivos and
Preservation of Santa Ynez, the event drew about 150 spectators.
The
candidates were given a two minute opportunity to introduce themselves and then
were asked a series of questions by the moderator. Each candidate was given a two minute
opportunity to answer the question before the next candidate had a chance to
answer. Candidates also were presented
with written questions from the audience and posed questions to each other
during the event.
At
the start of the event, after moderator Eric Burroughs had read the letter of
regret from Smyser, the crowd loudly snickered at the
reasons Smyser gave for his absence. During the portions of the event that
candidates were able to ask questions of each other, some candidates posed the
questions to the empty chair that was to have been occupied by Smyser.
Burroughs
posed questions having to do with the preservation of agricultural lands,
mitigation of traffic impacts due to increased tourism, Chumash tribal
operations at the casino and in surrounding community, commercial development
in the Valley, crime, Earth Day, and rezoning of agricultural lands.
All
the candidates stressed their long local experience on various water boards,
planning commissions, city councils and school boards, as well as their problem
solving abilities as demonstrated by their knowledge and willingness to listen
to the voices of the voters.
On
only a few questions did the candidates differ substantially, if at all, on
their positions.
The candidates were asked, “What
is your position on reducing the amount of land necessary to establish
agricultural preserves to 10 acres as a means of protecting agricultural land;
it is now 40 acres?”
Candidates
Bearman, Pointer, and Pappas all agreed that a 10
acre agricultural piece of property is too small to be of sufficient use to a
farmer. Doreen Farr was the lone
dissenter, saying, “I think it’s a great idea!
We want to protect and preserve the agricultural land. If we could get the threshold down to 10
acres then more people would convert to agriculture.”
Victoria
Pointer’s positions on gaming expansion and annexation of properties by the
Chumash tribe set her apart from the other three. Bearman,
Pappas and Farr all indicated opposition in strong terms, some going so far as
to say that they are “fighting” and “against” gaming expansion and tribal
methods. Pointer, by contrast, used
moderate language to express a message of inclusion.
“Anytime
one tries to prevent someone’s voice from being heard, there is a big
problem…I’m not in favor of increased gaming.
We need to embrace their culture and promote it. If they want to play by all the rules, then
they should be welcomed. I’m not so sure
that their intent is what is being said.
I am a good listener and good mediator,” Pointer said.
One
member of the audience, Bob Leite, who is also a
member of the Santa Ynez Valley Airport Authority board, noted the way one
question was slanted to imply that an airport expansion is taking place when no
such expansion is planned. The question
posed was “Should an environmental impact report be required for expansion of the
airport?”
Leite said that there are various use
permits in process and even plans for additional hangars, but the hangars will
be primarily used to shelter aircraft that are already based at the airport.
During
the part of the forum in which the candidates were allowed to ask questions of
each other, the participants lobbed softballs at each other and even asked
questions that allowed their opponents to further expound on their
qualifications for office.